Caught In The Middle: The New Role Of Platform Teams

Earlier this year, nan level squad astatine a world slope introduced a caller workflow for developers to proviso unreality environments connected demand. The extremity was to amended transportation velocity and trim dependency connected manual approvals. The infrastructure rolled retired smoothly. Within weeks, teams were launching workloads crossed AWS, Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and Microsoft Azure.

Then nan questions started.

Finance asked why definite environments were moving successful high-cost regions. Security flagged resources missing encryption tags. Compliance asked whether logs for nonproduction environments were being stored according to soul policy. The information squad asked whether nan level could merge an AI agent to observe and remediate drift automatically.

None of these were incidents. Nothing failed. The strategy behaved precisely arsenic designed.

But each mobility required penetration into a different portion of nan organization. Cloud configuration. Internal policy. Team behavior. Risk exposure. No azygous group owned nan afloat picture.

The level squad was expected to reply anyway.

Everyday Decisions astatine Enterprise Scale

In ample enterprises, infrastructure activity is distributed by design. Application teams ain services. Security defines guardrails. Compliance defines requirements. Finance tracks spend. Infrastructure teams negociate shared foundations.

Each group operates pinch partial context.

Platform teams beryllium closest to nan workflows that link each of this together. As a result, they are pulled into decisions that span aggregate domains.

In a emblematic week, a level squad whitethorn beryllium asked to explain:

• Why a workload launched successful a region that was technically allowed but operationally discouraged.
• Why definite resources deficiency costs attribution moreover though tagging standards exist.
• Whether entree patterns comply pinch soul argumentation erstwhile aggregate personality systems are involved.
• Whether an AI-assisted workflow tin beryllium audited successful nan aforesaid measurement arsenic a manual one.

These are not separator cases. They are regular questions that look from scale, decentralization and changeless change.

The Expanding Role of Platform Engineering

Platform teams were primitively chartered to amended transportation velocity and consistency. Over time, that instruction has expanded.

Today, level leaders are expected to measurement successful on:

• Security posture and enforcement boundaries.
• Cost controls and ratio trade-offs.
• Compliance visibility and audit readiness.
• Governance astir alteration and access.
• The safe usage of AI agents wrong infrastructure workflows.

They are not only building systems. They are shaping decisions that transportation financial, regulatory and operational consequences.

Yet these expectations seldom travel pinch corresponding authority.

Responsibility Without Structure

Platform teams are often asked to explicate outcomes they did not straight cause. They are expected to supply answers without owning nan policy, fund aliases workload.

This creates a structural tension.

The squad has capable discourse to beryllium accountable, but not capable leverage to group direction. They go nan spot wherever unresolved questions land, simply because they are closest to nan execution layer.

As nan number of regular infrastructure events, situation changes, entree updates, argumentation evaluations and AI-driven actions grows, this hostility compounds. The activity becomes little astir building and much astir interpreting, coordinating and justifying decisions crossed teams.

What Needs To Change

If level teams are going to proceed operating astatine this intersection, organizations request to adjust nan measurement they support them.

That means:

• Making ownership visible crossed environments, teams and services.
• Involving level leaders earlier successful argumentation and governance discussions.
• Providing systems that grounds and explicate why decisions were made, not conscionable what changed.
• Giving level teams nan expertise to push backmost erstwhile requirements conflict aliases outpace capacity.

These teams already usability arsenic a coordination layer. The building astir them has not caught up.

Conclusion

Platform engineering is nary longer confined to infrastructure delivery. It has go a decision-making usability that operates crossed security, compliance, finance and operations.

This displacement did not hap each astatine once. It emerged gradually arsenic systems scaled and responsibilities fragmented.

Platform teams now run successful nan mediate of nan statement by necessity. Recognizing that reality is nan first measurement toward supporting it properly.

Group Created pinch Sketch.