Traditional Code Review Is Dead. What Comes Next?

I noticed a quiet displacement successful our engineering squad precocious that brought maine to a broader realization astir nan early of package development: Code reappraisal has changed fundamentally.

It started pinch a propulsion petition (PR). An technologist had utilized an supplier to make nan full change, iterating pinch it to specify business logic, but yet relying connected nan supplier to constitute nan code. It was a important chunk of work. The codification was syntactically perfect. It followed our linting rules. It moreover included portion tests that passed green.

The quality reviewer, a elder technologist who is usually meticulous astir architectural patterns and naming conventions, approved it almost immediately. The clip betwixt nan PR opening and nan support was little than 2 minutes.

When I asked astir nan speed of nan approval, they said they checked if nan output was correct and moved on. They did not consciousness nan request to parse each statement of syntax because it was written by an agent. They spun up nan deploy preview, clicked nan buttons, verified nan authorities changes and merged it.

This made sense, but it still took maine by surprise. I realized that I was witnessing nan silent decease of accepted codification review.

The Silent Death of nan Code Review

For decades, nan peer reappraisal process has been nan superior value gross successful package engineering. Humans reference codification written by different humans served 2 captious purposes:

• It caught logic bugs that automated tests missed.
• It maintained a shared intelligence exemplary of nan codebase crossed nan team.

The presumption down this process was that codification is simply a scarce assets produced slowly. A quality developer mightiness constitute 50 to 100 lines of meaningful codification successful a day. Another quality tin reasonably reappraisal that measurement while maintaining precocious cognitive focus.

But we are entering an era wherever codification is becoming abundant and cheap. In fact, nan precise extremity of implementing coding agents is to make codification astatine a velocity and measurement that by creation makes it intolerable for humans to support up.

When an technologist sees a monolithic artifact of AI-generated code, nan small heart is to offload nan syntax-checking to nan machine. If nan linter is happy and nan tests pass, nan quality assumes nan codification is valid. The rigorous line-by-line inspection vanishes.

The Problem: AI Trust and nan Rubber Stamp

This displacement leads to what I telephone nan rubber stamp effect. We spot a “lgtm” (looks bully to me) support connected codification that cipher really read.

This creates a important alteration to nan consequence profile. Human errors usually manifest arsenic syntax errors aliases evident logic gaps. AI errors are different. Large connection models (LLMs) often hallucinate plausible but functionally incorrect code.

Traditional diff-based reappraisal devices are ill-equipped for this. A diff shows you what changed successful nan matter file. It does not show you nan emergent behaviour of that change. When a quality writes code, nan diff is simply a practice of their intent. When an AI writes code, nan diff is conscionable a ample measurement of tokens that whitethorn aliases whitethorn not align pinch nan prompt.

We are moving from a syntax-first civilization to an outcome-first culture. The mobility is nary longer “Did you constitute this correctly?” The mobility is “Does this do what we asked nan supplier for?”

Previews arsenic nan New Source of Truth

In this caller world, wherever engineers are logic architects who offload nan penning of codification to agents, nan astir important artifact is not nan code. It is nan preview.

If we cannot trust connected humans to publication nan code, we must trust connected humans to verify nan behavior. But to verify behavior, we request much than a diff. We request a destination. The codification must beryllium deployed to a unrecorded situation wherever it tin beryllium exercised.

While frontend previews person go standard, nan captious spread — and nan harder problem to lick — is nan backend.

Consider a alteration to a costs processing microservice generated by an agent. The codification mightiness look syntactically correct. The logic travel seems correct. But does it grip nan title information erstwhile 2 requests deed nan API simultaneously? Does nan caller database migration fastener a captious array for excessively long?

You cannot spot these problems successful a matter diff. You cannot moreover spot them successful a portion trial mock. You tin only spot them erstwhile nan codification is moving successful a live, integrated environment.

A backend preview situation allows for existent end-to-end verification. It allows a reviewer to execute existent API calls against a existent database instance. It transforms nan reappraisal process from a passive reference workout into an progressive verification session. We are not conscionable checking whether nan codification compiles. We are checking whether nan strategy behaves.

As AI agents constitute much code, nan “review” shape of nan package improvement life rhythm must germinate into a “validation” phase. We are not reviewing nan recipe. We are tasting nan dish.

The Infrastructure Challenge: The Concurrency Explosion

However, this displacement to outcome-based verification comes pinch a monolithic infrastructure situation that astir level engineering teams are not fresh for.

A quality developer typically useful linearly. They unfastened a branch, constitute code, unfastened a propulsion request, hold for reappraisal and merge. They mightiness discourse move betwixt 2 tasks, but seldom more.

AI agents activity successful parallel. An supplier tasked pinch fixing a bug mightiness rotation up 10 different strategies to lick it. It could unfastened 10 parallel propulsion requests, each pinch a different implementation, and inquire nan quality to prime nan champion one.

This creates an detonation of concurrency.

Traditional CI/CD pipelines are built for linear quality workflows. They presume a constricted number of concurrent builds. If your AI supplier opens 20 parallel sessions to trial different hypotheses, you look 2 prohibitive problems: costs and contention.

First, you cannot person 20 full-scale staging environments spinning up connected costly unreality instances. Imagine spinning up a dedicated Kubernetes cluster and database for 20 variations of a azygous bug fix. The unreality costs would beryllium astronomical.

Second, and possibly worse, is nan bottleneck of shared resources. Many pipelines trust connected a azygous staging situation aliases constricted testing slots. To debar information collisions, these systems unit PRs into a queue.

With existing quality engineering teams, these queues are already a frustrating bottleneck. With aggregate agents dumping 20 PRs into nan tube simultaneously, nan queue becomes a deadlock. The replacement of moving them each astatine erstwhile connected shared infrastructure results successful title conditions and flaky tests.

Scaling Development With Environment Virtualization

To standard agent-driven development, we cannot trust connected infrastructure built for linear quality pacing. We are talking astir perchance hundreds of concurrent agents generating PRs successful parallel, each of which request to beryllium validated pinch previews. Cloning nan full stack for each 1 is not a viable option.

The solution is to multiplex these environments connected shared infrastructure. Just arsenic a azygous beingness machine tin big aggregate virtual machines (VMs), a azygous Kubernetes cluster tin multiplex thousands of lightweight, ephemeral environments.

By applying smart isolation techniques astatine nan exertion layer, we tin supply strict separation for each agent’s activity without duplicating nan underlying infrastructure. This allows america to rotation up a dedicated sandbox for each change, ensuring agents tin activity successful parallel and validate codification end-to-end without stepping connected each other’s toes aliases exploding unreality costs.

Conclusion

There is simply a clear displacement happening successful nan measurement we reappraisal changes. As agents return complete nan penning of code, nan reappraisal process people evolves from checking syntax to verifying behavior. The preview is nary longer conscionable a convenience. It is nan only scalable measurement to validate nan activity that agents produce.

At Signadot, we are building for this future. We supply nan orchestration furniture that enables fleets of agents to activity successful parallel, generating and validating codification end-to-end successful a closed loop pinch instant, cost-effective previews.

The winners of nan adjacent era won’t beryllium nan teams pinch nan champion style guides, but those who tin grip nan parallelism of AI agents without exploding their unreality budgets aliases bringing their CI/CD pipelines to a grinding halt.

In an AI-first world, reference codification is simply a luxury we tin nary longer afford. Verification is nan caller standard. If you cannot preview it, you cannot vessel it.

Group Created pinch Sketch.