What “socioeconomic Preferences” Actually Mean

It’s assemblage exertion season. For precocious schoolhouse seniors, it’s a clip filled pinch drama. But this year, elite universities look a play of their own.

This fall, nan College Board abruptly discontinued its “Landscape” tool, which allowed assemblage admissions officers to stitchery “socioeconomic” accusation astir applicants’ neighborhoods and precocious schools. The College Board’s determination to axe nan instrumentality comes amid a federal government crackdown connected forbidden title proxies successful assemblage admissions, and followed soon aft Naomi Schaefer Riley exposed really Landscape’s data, while seemingly color-blind, were cautiously primed to emblem achromatic applicants and different favored demographics.

While colleges effort to regroup from nan nonaccomplishment of a instrumentality that provided labeling information connected millions of applicants, scrutiny is overdue connected really admissions departments usage “socioeconomic” preferences—also called “class” preferences, adding a neo-Marxist, critical-theory sheen. These efforts should beryllium named for what they almost ever are: thinly cloaked pretexts for group discrimination.

Racial preferences successful admissions, of course, person been forbidden since nan Supreme Court’s ruling 2 years agone successful SFFA v. Harvard. Elite universities person responded to nan ruling successful 1 of 2 ways. Some, specified arsenic MIT and Stanford, person apparently complied. These institutions—in keeping pinch nan predictions of amicus briefs, expert witnesses, and attorneys during oral arguments—report rising Asian enrollment and declining achromatic enrollment.

Other elite schools, including Harvard, Yale, Princeton, and Duke, miraculously maintained their pre-SFFA group proportions—despite their dire predictions that a prohibition connected affirmative action would drastically alteration group percentages connected campus. How was this possible? Did these schools simply pretend to comply pinch SFFA, utilizing purportedly race-neutral proxies (like Landscape) to execute group goals?

Socioeconomic preferences enactment arsenic a screen for group goals. Ever since nan constitutionality of title preferences was first questioned successful DeFunis v. Odegaard (1974), facially nonracial criteria, specified arsenic zip codes—used by Landscape’s predecessor, Adversity Score—have often served arsenic proxies for race.

Without Landscape, universities will apt devise different socioeconomic race-proxy scheme. Modern Big Data techniques and increasingly nuanced artificial intelligence will let colleges to reverse-engineer their ain substitutes, custom-tailored and moreover much precise than Landscape. Race proxies via socioeconomic preferences won’t extremity pinch Landscape.

Socioeconomic preferences are sold to Americans pinch a bait-and-switch: economic preferences are nan bait, and “socioeconomic” preferences are nan switch. The usage of nan “socio” prefix by race-proxy proponents is intentional. Whatever 1 thinks of them, purely economical preferences—boosting applicants from mediocre backgrounds—are straightforward. Their intent (to thief nan poor) is transparent, and their metrics (student/family income) are objective. Such clarity connected some ends and intends makes purely economical penchant an easy sell. Americans are generous.

But past race-proxy proponents deploy nan switch, tacking connected nan “socio” prefix. They switch “low income” for “socioeconomically disadvantaged,” and “poor” for “marginalized class.” While everyone understands what “low-income” means, astir group don’t recognize that nan position “socioeconomically disadvantaged” and “marginalized” aren’t utilized for nan poor—they alternatively smuggle successful concepts that tin service arsenic proxies for race.

Take nan University of California’s socioeconomic admissions rubric, which considers first-language and single-parent households. If Cal had wanted purely economical preferences, it could person utilized poorness metrics exclusively. It didn’t.

Instead, Cal’s administrators usage proxies that let for admitting students based connected race. After all, whites and Asians are acold likelier than blacks to travel from two-parent households. And while Asians, for illustration Hispanics, often travel from migrant backgrounds, Asian parents often push their children harder to assimilate English arsenic their first language, arsenic evidenced by SAT verbal scores.

Other colleges usage akin tactics. Williams College and nan University of Michigan, for example, measurement first-generation assemblage status. UCLA Law School and Lehman College solicit “systems-involved” aliases “criminal-justice-impacted” applicants—elite-speak for applicants (or their families) pinch criminal records. Asian communities, moreover erstwhile poor, person debased crime rates.

Socioeconomic preferences person moreover trickled down to K-12. The New York City Department of Education’s “Economic Need Index,” for example, doesn’t measurement what its sanction implies. Neither income nor wealthiness are assessed. That’s because successful New York City, Asians are arsenic mediocre arsenic blacks and Hispanics. Instead, a cardinal ENI criterion is whether a student “lived successful impermanent lodging successful nan past 4 years.” This, again, serves arsenic a group proxy, since acold much mediocre blacks and Hispanics (89 percent of residents of specified arrangements) unrecorded successful temporary housing than arsenic mediocre Asians (less than 1 percent).

The latest elite-speak is “subjective socioeconomic status,” which intends precisely what 1 suspects. Imagine really that will play out.

In sum, socioeconomic preferences are conscionable much affirmative action. They are neither race-blind, arsenic claimed, nor utilized to thief nan poor, arsenic claimed. It’s clip for nan covert schemes to stop. Elite colleges should uphold nan standards of meritocracy, pinch transparency and pinch adjacent authorities for all.

Photo: Ben Milam / iStock / Getty Images Plus via Getty Images